The links below are to articles on POPULAR MAINSTREAM websites that invite comments. Your intelligent comments on those websites will surely be much appreciated by the public.
This will only serve to increase the power of the backlash!
People can be very docile. I'm taking nothing for granted yet!
But there has, however, been a positive and significant move in our direction. A national newspaper is now vociferously opposing feminism. This is something new, and we mustn't underestimate its importance.
Tell you what though. Bet the first mass revolters against feminism to appear on television will be women!
"Tell you what though. Bet the first mass revolters against feminism to appear on television will be women"
Of course! Women will be portrayed as the liberators of men. Once women realise that there's going to be an inevitable backlash against feminism, they'll infiltrate our movement and claim all the credit.
The success of our movement, of course, should far outweigh any personal credit for bringing it about. (Although there are men in our movement -- from Harry to Glenn Sacks -- who do deserve a tremendous amount of credit for their time and efforts, I am sure they are tough enough to be more focussed on our goal.)
I also welcome supportive women. They do exist, and are a wonderful breath of fresh air from the usual dose of man-hating sneer we see in the media. (I highly recommend Esther Vilar's book The Manipulated Man. Her insights are nothing short of brilliant, and not even I would dream of quoting her -- just yet.)
What worries me is this. If and when politicians can no longer pretend they can leave this one under the dusty old boots in the attic, we'll probably get some watery half-baked measures to maximise their votes from certain directions and not lose too many from others. And this is with not a single representative from the MM being invited to a television debate, but rather with one involving only politicians and feminists, chaired by Kirsty Wark.
I hear your brother. They'll keep the whole thing swept under the rug as much as possible for a long as possible and hope it goes away; which it won't.
Our only real hope is that the mainstream media (read: TV) loses it prominence over the coming years. That's how Ms Wark and her ilk stage-manage the debate and control the information that reaches the hearts and minds of the public. The MSM is the feminists' best friend.
Our only real hope is that the mainstream media (read: TV) loses it prominence over the coming years.
This is exactly what Bill Gates is predicting.
Transmitting a show at a particular time was only to fit in everything with the limited technology we had in the 1950's to the latter part of the 20th century.
In the coming years, however, when download speeds permit it, you'll be able to download from the internet a show (such as Coronation Street or some News presentation) whenever you want it. It need not be at a specific time that has to fit in with television channels' schedules.
This means moving from TV to the internet. And it will mean greater exposure of the MM to the public at large.
It will also mean that those lying crooks known as "politicians" will come under wider scrutiny than ever before. The same applies to press barons who have senior politicians in their pocket, and who have made billions out of ruining the lives of people.
In the past, the power of groups like these lay in the fact we didn't have a voice. Now we have.
This might fill one with a sense of optimism. However, a word of caution. We've never yet had a backlash from politicians or the press. Bear in mind that groups like these are not going to give up their power willingly. I think there'll come a time when they will try to put mufflers on people voicing opinions they don't like.
Rupert Murdoch only has to say to Brown, "Bring out a new law, eh?", and Brown (or his successor) will bring out a new law.
That's an interesting notion; that there'll be a backlash against the backlash. Feminists and their male-lackey politicians may use legislation to silence (or attempt to) the MM. I've even heard of feminists in Canada trying to pass a law that would ban criticism of feminism on the internet.
Well, I for one won't stop disseminating this information over the INTERNET!
Check out my YouTube channel: www.youtube.com/user/WizardKing78
8 comments:
I'm so angered by this article I don't know where to begin.
Well, at least we can look on the bright-side. This will only serve to increase the power of the backlash!
This will only serve to increase the power of the backlash!
People can be very docile. I'm taking nothing for granted yet!
But there has, however, been a positive and significant move in our direction. A national newspaper is now vociferously opposing feminism. This is something new, and we mustn't underestimate its importance.
Tell you what though. Bet the first mass revolters against feminism to appear on television will be women!
"Tell you what though. Bet the first mass revolters against feminism to appear on television will be women"
Of course! Women will be portrayed as the liberators of men. Once women realise that there's going to be an inevitable backlash against feminism, they'll infiltrate our movement and claim all the credit.
The success of our movement, of course, should far outweigh any personal credit for bringing it about. (Although there are men in our movement -- from Harry to Glenn Sacks -- who do deserve a tremendous amount of credit for their time and efforts, I am sure they are tough enough to be more focussed on our goal.)
I also welcome supportive women. They do exist, and are a wonderful breath of fresh air from the usual dose of man-hating sneer we see in the media. (I highly recommend Esther Vilar's book The Manipulated Man. Her insights are nothing short of brilliant, and not even I would dream of quoting her -- just yet.)
What worries me is this. If and when politicians can no longer pretend they can leave this one under the dusty old boots in the attic, we'll probably get some watery half-baked measures to maximise their votes from certain directions and not lose too many from others. And this is with not a single representative from the MM being invited to a television debate, but rather with one involving only politicians and feminists, chaired by Kirsty Wark.
I hear your brother. They'll keep the whole thing swept under the rug as much as possible for a long as possible and hope it goes away; which it won't.
Our only real hope is that the mainstream media (read: TV) loses it prominence over the coming years. That's how Ms Wark and her ilk stage-manage the debate and control the information that reaches the hearts and minds of the public. The MSM is the feminists' best friend.
Our only real hope is that the mainstream media (read: TV) loses it prominence over the coming years.
This is exactly what Bill Gates is predicting.
Transmitting a show at a particular time was only to fit in everything with the limited technology we had in the 1950's to the latter part of the 20th century.
In the coming years, however, when download speeds permit it, you'll be able to download from the internet a show (such as Coronation Street or some News presentation) whenever you want it. It need not be at a specific time that has to fit in with television channels' schedules.
This means moving from TV to the internet. And it will mean greater exposure of the MM to the public at large.
It will also mean that those lying crooks known as "politicians" will come under wider scrutiny than ever before. The same applies to press barons who have senior politicians in their pocket, and who have made billions out of ruining the lives of people.
In the past, the power of groups like these lay in the fact we didn't have a voice. Now we have.
This might fill one with a sense of optimism. However, a word of caution. We've never yet had a backlash from politicians or the press. Bear in mind that groups like these are not going to give up their power willingly. I think there'll come a time when they will try to put mufflers on people voicing opinions they don't like.
Rupert Murdoch only has to say to Brown, "Bring out a new law, eh?", and Brown (or his successor) will bring out a new law.
That's an interesting notion; that there'll be a backlash against the backlash. Feminists and their male-lackey politicians may use legislation to silence (or attempt to) the MM. I've even heard of feminists in Canada trying to pass a law that would ban criticism of feminism on the internet.
Well, I for one won't stop disseminating this information over the INTERNET!
Check out my YouTube channel: www.youtube.com/user/WizardKing78
Post a Comment