The links below are to articles on POPULAR MAINSTREAM websites that invite comments. Your intelligent comments on those websites will surely be much appreciated by the public.
Remember that the Daily Mail is a woman's paper and this is the kind of trash that women are obsessed with: celebrity, gossip and scandal.
John Leslie is himself a product of the feminised system that most of us are forced to live in. He is, in fact, what women like and what they enjoy reading about.
Vicious circle.
Time this kind of invasion of privacy was owtlawed (like in other countries) so that papers like the Daily Mail could quietly go bust.
"Time this kind of invasion of privacy was owtlawed (like in other countries) so that papers like the Daily Mail could quietly go bust."
I believe in absolute freedom of speech - even for newspapers - regardless of how utterly abhorrent it may be. What I find objectionable is the femi-cunt bias that pervades every angle of the media. The only way to tackle that is to make men angry about it!
Oh, and rape-shield laws HAVE TO GO! In the interests of fairness and equality it's time that accusers weren't allowed to hide behind anonymity.
I think AH is extremely busy with 'real life' stuff atm.
The thing I've noticed about the daily mail is that often a number of comments will appear early in the day, then none will be added for the rest of the day.
Libertarian - "I believe in absolute freedom of speech - even for newspapers - regardless of how utterly abhorrent it may be."
"Absolute freedom of speech"?
So, do you think that it should be legal for a newspaper to, let's say, accuse all the posters on this site of being paedophiles or, let's say, rapists who got away with their crimes?
6 comments:
Remember that the Daily Mail is a woman's paper and this is the kind of trash that women are obsessed with: celebrity, gossip and scandal.
John Leslie is himself a product of the feminised system that most of us are forced to live in. He is, in fact, what women like and what they enjoy reading about.
Vicious circle.
Time this kind of invasion of privacy was owtlawed (like in other countries) so that papers like the Daily Mail could quietly go bust.
"Time this kind of invasion of privacy was owtlawed (like in other countries) so that papers like the Daily Mail could quietly go bust."
I believe in absolute freedom of speech - even for newspapers - regardless of how utterly abhorrent it may be. What I find objectionable is the femi-cunt bias that pervades every angle of the media. The only way to tackle that is to make men angry about it!
Oh, and rape-shield laws HAVE TO GO! In the interests of fairness and equality it's time that accusers weren't allowed to hide behind anonymity.
"Remember that the Daily Mail is a woman's paper and this is the kind of trash that women are obsessed with: celebrity, gossip and scandal."
I find an odd sort of paper, can't seem to get any comments listed and noted similar problems when posting on their forums a few years back.
ps Where's AH these days, he's gone very quiet. Everything ok is it?
I think AH is extremely busy with 'real life' stuff atm.
The thing I've noticed about the daily mail is that often a number of comments will appear early in the day, then none will be added for the rest of the day.
I left two comments on that article by Carol Sarler in jer latest article, neither was posted and no reply back from the editor either.
Libertarian - "I believe in absolute freedom of speech - even for newspapers - regardless of how utterly abhorrent it may be."
"Absolute freedom of speech"?
So, do you think that it should be legal for a newspaper to, let's say, accuse all the posters on this site of being paedophiles or, let's say, rapists who got away with their crimes?
Post a Comment